Why the arXiv should totally have, like, comments, dude.


Lately I’ve had my nose to the grindstone, so not many substantial physics posts. (I have a few in pipeline.) But, in a spare moment, I had a very nice chuckle reading comments on this paper on E8 unification, provocatively titled `An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything.’

The title is a play on the `exceptional’ Lie Group E8, which I think is really funny. I’d consider it a candidate for Bee’s `Stupid Title List.’ Though I should note that I prefer to think her list as the `Totally Awesome Title List!‘ Maybe I would have thrown in a `cowabunga‘ somewhere for good measure. 🙂

Anyway, some charming members of the scientifically-inclined general public started commenting on the paper after it was posted on the aggregation site reddit. Some of the comments absolutely made my day. My favourites are below the break.

I got halfway through before realizing it wasn’t an xkcd cartoon. -reddit_user13

The reference is to xkcd comics which usually pokes fun at geeky life (including mathematics and programming). I have to admit that getting halfway through a hep-th paper on gauge-gravity unification while waiting for a punchline is rather impressive. 🙂

Could anyone summarise it? In all honesty, and I don’t mean to sound like some sort of retard here, but pages that contain complex mathematics scare me in ways I don’t understand. -Xiol

Summary? It’s in the abstract. 🙂 Layman’s summary: Maybe gravity is related to matter and the other forces in a tidy mathematical way. (To be fair I wrote that based only on the first sentence of the abstract.)


I’m pretty sure not understanding complex theoretical physics doesn’t make you a retard. At least I hope and pray 😦 -pavel_lishin


Theory grad students wake up every morning and say the same prayer, Pavel.

We already have a simple theory for everything: Magic Man DONE IT! -kanack

How can I not applaud a comment that links to a YouTube clip of UK comedian Robin Ince?

u had me at formula 1.1 -kingnerd

A Jerry Maguire reference. Kingnerd also gets my kudos. 🙂

a pdf? that is a big commitment -nebulous

So nebulous’ thought process must have been something like this: Hmm… on the one hand, this link claims to be able to explain the secrets of the universe in a very easy way that I can understand. On the other hand, it’s a pdf file.

Whatever you say about the theory, you have to love the pretty pictures. -petelyons

Does anyone else have similar thoughts during seminar talks? (Especially Roger Penrose’s meticulously drawn transparencies!)

13 Responses to “Why the arXiv should totally have, like, comments, dude.”

  1. Somewhat more seriously, perhaps the arXiv should have comments? (Or, since it really doesn’t seem right to saddle the arXiv maintainers with that, there should be another site where people can comment on papers in the arXiv.)

  2. 2 Rien

    Isabel, there are some sites like that but they don’t seem to be used very much. In fact, I can’t even remember what they are now…

    I’m not so sure it would be a good idea, considering that that’s theplace where you put your paper that you put a lot of work into, and then anybody would be able to submit comments with insulting attacks without any scientific merit. Or something like that.

  3. Hell yah the arXiv needs comments, and ratings. That way I wouldn’t have to track down every bloody blog that’s linking to the paper and respond to comments there.

    I don’t think anyone on Reddit has yet figured out that the author is commenting on the thread. Heh.

  4. Hell yah the arXiv needs comments, and ratings. That way I wouldn’t have to track down every bloody blog that’s linking to the paper and respond to comments there.

    I don’t think anyone on Reddit has yet figured out that the author is commenting on the thread. Heh.

  5. Hi Isabel and Garrett! A quick thought: the arXiv needs comments/ratings like I need tenure; it would be really cool, but at the end of the day we’re just not ready for it yet. 🙂

  6. Hi Flip,

    Regarding the arxiv comments, I have suggested this previously here, here, and here. See also comments there. I’ve submitted this suggestion in the survey mentioned in the last post I linked to, I think they are working one some redo of several features – the present arxiv search function is becoming less and less efficient, and given that many people rely they find the relevant papers there it’s a crucial problem. The result is that citations more and more focus on some first few obvious references, plus the first some dozens of hits on the arxiv for a certain word in the title. It’s completely nonsensical. E.g. I have a paper about topic X that however doesn’t have word X in the title (when I wrote it it wasn’t clear which keyword would be the relevant one). So I waste an enormous waste of time telling people I’ve said before what they’ve written in their paper.

    Either way, nice post 🙂



  7. yeah yeah, I waste an enormous waste of time, gee, I shouldn’t comment on blogs before 10 am, need to get some coffee now…

  8. I like the list!! (It’s certainly the most fun one can have while checking the arXiv.)

  9. You might be interested in http://scirate.com/

  10. Leave it to the dude(ette)s at Slashdot to provide a comment that may actually be of help to the New-Scientist-reading lay-audience.


    There are a few technical points that aren’t of much consequence to most readers. E.g. he uses analogies for fractional spin particles [i.e. the Lorentz group] when describing gauge groups. It’s a different idea, but to zeroth order what’s important is that the reader understands the role of symmetry. What I think is a bit of a shame is that the comment doesn’t really get to the root of why `theories of everything’ are interesting — namely unification. That’s what is interesting from the scientific point of view, I think.

  11. And they’re still going, this time citing the blogosphere:

  12. hello it is test. WinRAR provides the full RAR and ZIP file support, can decompress CAB, GZIP, ACE and other archive formats.

  1. 1 If Digg (or Reddit) ran the arXiv « An American Physics Student in England

%d bloggers like this: