Why the arXiv should totally have, like, comments, dude.
Lately I’ve had my nose to the grindstone, so not many substantial physics posts. (I have a few in pipeline.) But, in a spare moment, I had a very nice chuckle reading comments on this paper on E8 unification, provocatively titled `An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything.’
The title is a play on the `exceptional’ Lie Group E8, which I think is really funny. I’d consider it a candidate for Bee’s `Stupid Title List.’ Though I should note that I prefer to think her list as the `Totally Awesome Title List!‘ Maybe I would have thrown in a `cowabunga‘ somewhere for good measure. 🙂
Anyway, some charming members of the scientifically-inclined general public started commenting on the paper after it was posted on the aggregation site reddit. Some of the comments absolutely made my day. My favourites are below the break.
I got halfway through before realizing it wasn’t an xkcd cartoon. -reddit_user13
The reference is to xkcd comics which usually pokes fun at geeky life (including mathematics and programming). I have to admit that getting halfway through a hep-th paper on gauge-gravity unification while waiting for a punchline is rather impressive. 🙂
Could anyone summarise it? In all honesty, and I don’t mean to sound like some sort of retard here, but pages that contain complex mathematics scare me in ways I don’t understand. -Xiol
Summary? It’s in the abstract. 🙂 Layman’s summary: Maybe gravity is related to matter and the other forces in a tidy mathematical way. (To be fair I wrote that based only on the first sentence of the abstract.)
I’m pretty sure not understanding complex theoretical physics doesn’t make you a retard. At least I hope and pray 😦 -pavel_lishin
Theory grad students wake up every morning and say the same prayer, Pavel.
We already have a simple theory for everything: Magic Man DONE IT! -kanack
How can I not applaud a comment that links to a YouTube clip of UK comedian Robin Ince?
u had me at formula 1.1 -kingnerd
A Jerry Maguire reference. Kingnerd also gets my kudos. 🙂
a pdf? that is a big commitment -nebulous
So nebulous’ thought process must have been something like this: Hmm… on the one hand, this link claims to be able to explain the secrets of the universe in a very easy way that I can understand. On the other hand, it’s a pdf file.
Whatever you say about the theory, you have to love the pretty pictures. -petelyons
Does anyone else have similar thoughts during seminar talks? (Especially Roger Penrose’s meticulously drawn transparencies!)
Filed under: Just for Fun | 13 Comments